I don’t have a whole lot of time today to get into the why, but trust me, it’s important that you read this article on Climate Change: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/01/science/earth/climate.html
Biggest problem I have is that many wealthy nations (US included) have been tinkering with the language of the report, requesting changes. Now is the time to just lay out the facts on the table, with no sugar-coating and no agenda, and then come up with a real, actionable plan for the survival of the world and humanity. But no, it’s politics as usual for the moneymakers. Bah.
And if you still disagree with the findings of 99.5% of the scientific community and choose to believe that humanity ISN’T destroying the world, I have a song for you:
Edited to add that 99.5% is by no means a reliable statistical figure, but merely me exaggerating for effect. And for good measure, here is my last paragraph that I wrote in reply to a comment.
“Even if the climate change we’ve experienced thus far is a completely natural cycle, and our human impact is negligible, the argument for changing the way we operate as a country and a global society still stands, I think. Because if the coasts keeps getting slammed by storms, if further earthquakes and tsunamis are on the horizon, and if the ice caps keep melting, and if all this is happening while we’re losing more and more clean water to chemical spills and big corporations hording water for business purposes, and more people are going to be starving due to long dry spells, then these problems all still need to be addressed, regardless of whether it’s a natural disaster or one of our own making.”